Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Mathematics as a Hobby over Tanduay-Coke.

It has been known for a long time that there are infinitely many prime numbers. A famous proof by Euclid goes like this:

Theorem 1 (Euclid). There are infinitely many prime numbers.
Proof. Suppose there are only finitely many prime numbers, and let us write them . Consider the number . By the unique factorization of integers, we know there is a prime which divides , but then should be different from (), contradiction. ////

Remark 2. The key idea in the above proof is that if you have a finitely many prime numbers , then as defined above has another prime as a factor. This idea of "constructing" a prime from a given set of primes can be generalized as follows.

Theorem 3. There are infinitely many primes which are congruent to 1 modulo 4, i.e. primes of the form for some positive integer
Proof. We use the fact that is a prime congruent to 1 modulo 4 if and only if there is an integer such that Now write finitely many primes congruent to as . Then consider the number . Any prime dividing --there is such a prime by the unique factorization property--is different from any of the primes and 2. Since we obviously have , . Thus the theorem is true. ////

(Important) Remark 4. The idea in the both proofs is to find a polynomial such that has a prime divisor and belongs to a certain "class" of prime numbers, for example the set of primes numbers congruent to 1 modulo 4 .

Definition 5. , where .

Lemma 6.
Let . Then has infinitely many prime divisors as runs through positive integers.
Proof. Omitted. ////

Lemma 7. If a prime divides for some positive integer , then . Here, is the m-th cyclotomic polynomial where runs through the primitive m-th roots of unity.
Proof. Omitted. ////

The statements of Lemmas 6 and 7 are weaker than what was suggested in Remark 4, but they are still enough to deduce the following theorem, which is a particular case of the (weak) Dirichlet theorem.

Theorem. The cardinality of is infinite.
Proof. Immediate from the lemmas. ////

0 comments: